Home / Citywide / District 1 dashboard / Dossier
Accountability dossier · Council District 1

District 1: what the public record shows, and where it goes silent.

Open the dashboardRequest the full dossierPrint this page
Total records7,52713.4% of 56,258 citywide
Complaints5,13668% of records
Notices of violation1,62131.6 per 100 complaints
No inspection date60.8%4,575 of 7,527 records
Closed, no result58.2%3,968 of 6,815 closed cases
Executive summary

District 1 holds 7,527 of the 56,258 landlord-tenant records in the citywide file (13.4%), covering 2003 through 2025. 5,136 are complaints and 1,621 are notices of violation: 31.6 notices per 100 complaints, against 24.6 citywide. By that measure District 1 ranks 6 of 7, where 1 is the lowest notice rate.

60.8% of the district's records display no inspection date, against 64.2% citywide (rank 6 of 7, where 1 is the highest share). Of 6,815 closed or completed cases, 58.2% show no inspection result, against 61.6% citywide. 393 records still read "Under Investigation."

The share of records opened in a given year that display an inspection result was 92.3% for 2013 and 12.9% for 2025. The address with the most records is 201 Yesler Way, with 87 records and 6 notices of violation.

These are measurements of what the public record contains. A missing inspection date does not prove that no inspection occurred, and a closed status is not proof that a condition was corrected.

Findings from the record

Every finding carries its label.

Analysis

Notice rate: 31.6 per 100 complaints against 24.6 citywide.

1,621 notices of violation on 5,136 complaints.Citywide landlord-tenant file, 56,258 records
Analysis

60.8% of records display no inspection date.

Citywide the share is 64.2%.4,575 of 7,527 District 1 records
Documented

Inspection results on file: 92.3% (opened 2013) to 12.9% (opened 2025).

Share of each year's records that display an inspection result.Field: last inspection result, by year opened
Documented

3,968 of 6,815 closed cases show no inspection result.

58.2% of closed or completed cases in District 1.Citywide: 61.6%
Open question

What was inspected before those cases closed?

The public export does not carry an inspection narrative for each case.Answerable only from the City's own case files
Limit of the record

A lower or higher rate does not say why.

It may reflect a different mix of complaints, faster resolution, or thinner documentation. The record alone cannot separate these.How STLCA reads every district figure
District 1 against the city

Side by side.

MeasureDistrict 1Citywide
Records7,52756,258
Complaints5,13640,540
Notices of violation1,6219,961
Notices per 100 complaints31.624.6
Records with no inspection date60.8%64.2%
Closed or completed, no inspection result58.2%61.6%
Records still "Under Investigation"3933,749
Records with a blank record type63.0%60.3%
The enforcement chain

What the record shows at each step.

1. Complaint
5,136complaints among 7,527 records
2. Inspection
60.8%of records display no inspection date (4,575)
3. Finding
Read per propertyCity findings documents are read address by address in case studies
4. Enforcement
1,621notices of violation, 31.6 per 100 complaints
5. Correction deadline
Not in this filecompliance-due dates are captured per notice in property runs
6. Follow-up
393records still read "Under Investigation"
7. Verified compliance
Not a public fieldthe public export has no verification field
8. Closure
58.2%of 6,815 closed or completed cases show no inspection result

Record volume, by year opened

02314636949262003: 1520032004: 1792005: 1282006: 1552007: 17620072008: 1832009: 1402010: 1262011: 14820112012: 1812013: 2082014: 1872015: 21220152016: 2202017: 3192018: 4492019: 49420192020: 5422021: 6452022: 8422023: 68920232024: 6062025: 6832025
Records per year opened. The last year (2025) is a full year of records through Dec 31, 2025.

Inspection result on file, by year opened

0%25%50%75%100%20032007201120152019202320252003: 67%2004: 73%2005: 68%2006: 67%2007: 66%2008: 82%2009: 84%2010: 90%2011: 93%2012: 90%2013: 92%2014: 84%2015: 83%2016: 79%2017: 64%2018: 24%2019: 18%2020: 23%2021: 31%2022: 19%2023: 13%2024: 11%2025: 13%
District 1Citywide
Share of that year's records that display an inspection result. Recent records may not yet have had an inspection.

Record status mix

COMPLETED: 5,505CLOSED: 1,310UNDER INVESTIGATION: 393INITIATED: 102NOV ISSUED: 89Other statuses: 1287,527records
Completed5,505
Closed1,310
Under Investigation393
Initiated102
Nov Issued89
Other Statuses128
Properties

Addresses that appear most in District 1.

AddressRecordsComplaintsNoticesClosed, no resultYears
201 Yesler Way8781671%2011–2025
223 Yesler Way6461275%2008–2025
212 Alaskan Way S6257584%2017–2025
4545 42nd Ave Sw6260279%2012–2025
9434 Delridge Way Sw49282132%2008–2022
3021 Sw Bradford St4139274%2014–2025
107 Cherry St3127464%2011–2025
115 Prefontaine Pl S3028279%2014–2025
65 S Washington St3028254%2017–2025
4040 26th Ave Sw2828096%2018–2024
6420 California Ave Sw2828087%2005–2025
9200 2nd Ave Sw2726169%2010–2025
600 Sw Kenyon St2620564%2004–2025
4840 California Ave Sw2518732%2008–2023
9230 2nd Ave Sw2523272%2012–2024
Ranked by records at the address. A high count describes the record, not the conduct of any person or company. Property Outcome Reports for any address are available on request.
Open the timeline

How Seattle built the system, and what the record shows since.

Show or hide the timeline
2012

RRIO created

CB 117569 became Ordinance 124011, creating Seattle's rental registration and inspection program.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2016

Tenant protections and monitoring

CB 118678 became Ordinance 125054, which directs the SDCI Director to report annually to Council on rent increases at units with outstanding code violations. Committee discussion of recurring rental-market monitoring followed on Sept 21, 2016.

Ordinance text on file; committee record
2017

Renters' Commission created

CB 118921 became Ordinance 125280, creating an advisory Renters' Commission. The same year CB 118974 became Ordinance 125343, rewriting RRIO reporting metrics. The first annual report under Ordinance 125054 came due June 15, 2017.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2018

Studies and workplans

A University of Washington and City Auditor rental housing study (July 24, 2018); the Commission's 2018 work plan; the Renting in Seattle materials (Sept 11, 2018).

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2023

Enforcement concerns raised

Commission minutes record renters raising enforcement concerns. Nine 2023 SDCI findings documents for one apartment complex show six administrative closures.

Commission minutes; SDCI findings documents
Mar 2025

SDCI states the annual report was never prepared

In writing: "we've never prepared such a report."

SDCI email, Mar 7, 2025
Aug 2026

Council passes CB 121254

The rental junk-fee bill requires landlords to keep compliance records for three years and presumes a violation, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence, where records are missing. Effective July 1, 2027.

Bill text, SMC 7.24.045 (CB 121254, version 3)
Entries marked "working timeline" come from STLCA's historical source review and are cited in each investigation before publication.
Limitations and method

Counts come from the citywide landlord-tenant file of 56,258 records through Dec 31, 2025. Districts are assigned by STLCA from each record's address and coordinates; 668 records could not be assigned. "Complaint" and "notice of violation" follow the file's own record-type flags. "No inspection date" and "no inspection result" follow the file's own flags and are measurements of the public record. STLCA does not add, remove or estimate records.

This dossier states no finding about the intent of any person or company. Named addresses are those that appear in the public record.

← District 7 dossierBack to the District 1 dashboardDistrict 2 dossier →
Public record. Independent review. Traceable findings. Data today. Change tomorrow.