Home / Citywide / District 7 dashboard / Dossier
Accountability dossier · Council District 7

District 7: what the public record shows, and where it goes silent.

Open the dashboardRequest the full dossierPrint this page
Total records7,89514.0% of 56,258 citywide
Complaints6,41981% of records
Notices of violation94614.7 per 100 complaints
No inspection date71.0%5,607 of 7,895 records
Closed, no result68.4%4,765 of 6,965 closed cases
Executive summary

District 7 holds 7,895 of the 56,258 landlord-tenant records in the citywide file (14.0%), covering 2003 through 2025. 6,419 are complaints and 946 are notices of violation: 14.7 notices per 100 complaints, against 24.6 citywide. By that measure District 7 ranks 1 of 7, where 1 is the lowest notice rate.

71.0% of the district's records display no inspection date, against 64.2% citywide (rank 1 of 7, where 1 is the highest share). Of 6,965 closed or completed cases, 68.4% show no inspection result, against 61.6% citywide. 677 records still read "Under Investigation."

The share of records opened in a given year that display an inspection result was 86.7% for 2013 and 15.4% for 2025. The address with the most records is 800 Seneca St, with 129 records and 7 notices of violation.

These are measurements of what the public record contains. A missing inspection date does not prove that no inspection occurred, and a closed status is not proof that a condition was corrected.

Findings from the record

Every finding carries its label.

Analysis

Notice rate: 14.7 per 100 complaints against 24.6 citywide.

946 notices of violation on 6,419 complaints.Citywide landlord-tenant file, 56,258 records
Analysis

71.0% of records display no inspection date.

Citywide the share is 64.2%.5,607 of 7,895 District 7 records
Documented

Inspection results on file: 86.7% (opened 2013) to 15.4% (opened 2025).

Share of each year's records that display an inspection result.Field: last inspection result, by year opened
Documented

4,765 of 6,965 closed cases show no inspection result.

68.4% of closed or completed cases in District 7.Citywide: 61.6%
Open question

What was inspected before those cases closed?

The public export does not carry an inspection narrative for each case.Answerable only from the City's own case files
Limit of the record

A lower or higher rate does not say why.

It may reflect a different mix of complaints, faster resolution, or thinner documentation. The record alone cannot separate these.How STLCA reads every district figure
District 7 against the city

Side by side.

MeasureDistrict 7Citywide
Records7,89556,258
Complaints6,41940,540
Notices of violation9469,961
Notices per 100 complaints14.724.6
Records with no inspection date71.0%64.2%
Closed or completed, no inspection result68.4%61.6%
Records still "Under Investigation"6773,749
Records with a blank record type55.7%60.3%
The enforcement chain

What the record shows at each step.

1. Complaint
6,419complaints among 7,895 records
2. Inspection
71.0%of records display no inspection date (5,607)
3. Finding
Read per propertyCity findings documents are read address by address in case studies
4. Enforcement
946notices of violation, 14.7 per 100 complaints
5. Correction deadline
Not in this filecompliance-due dates are captured per notice in property runs
6. Follow-up
677records still read "Under Investigation"
7. Verified compliance
Not a public fieldthe public export has no verification field
8. Closure
68.4%of 6,965 closed or completed cases show no inspection result

Record volume, by year opened

03376741,0111,3482003: 1120032004: 1072005: 1332006: 1472007: 10920072008: 952009: 822010: 852011: 10420112012: 1102013: 1202014: 1022015: 13720152016: 1532017: 2162018: 4862019: 55620192020: 5252021: 5882022: 8062023: 95220232024: 1,0452025: 1,2262025
Records per year opened. The last year (2025) is a full year of records through Dec 31, 2025.

Inspection result on file, by year opened

0%25%50%75%100%20032007201120152019202320252003: 73%2004: 61%2005: 65%2006: 80%2007: 69%2008: 72%2009: 80%2010: 80%2011: 88%2012: 90%2013: 87%2014: 77%2015: 85%2016: 74%2017: 69%2018: 23%2019: 22%2020: 19%2021: 18%2022: 11%2023: 13%2024: 14%2025: 15%
District 7Citywide
Share of that year's records that display an inspection result. Recent records may not yet have had an inspection.

Record status mix

COMPLETED: 5,162CLOSED: 1,803UNDER INVESTIGATION: 677OPEN DUPLICATE: 77INITIATED: 62Other statuses: 1147,895records
Completed5,162
Closed1,803
Under Investigation677
Open Duplicate77
Initiated62
Other Statuses114
Properties

Addresses that appear most in District 7.

AddressRecordsComplaintsNoticesClosed, no resultYears
800 Seneca St129122780%2016–2025
1102 8th Ave10798963%2003–2025
1110 8th Ave6457766%2008–2025
700 5th Ave6055593%2005–2023
1820 Minor Ave5846873%2005–2025
823 Madison St56401545%2005–2022
1902 2nd Ave5550560%2009–2025
1823 Terry Ave4746185%2013–2025
420 Pontius Ave N41400100%2018–2025
600 W Olympic Pl4135667%2005–2025
714 7th Ave3933644%2005–2025
809 Olive Way3835373%2016–2025
1118 5th Ave3631453%2007–2025
1814 Minor Ave3633383%2008–2025
704 Spring St3633369%2023–2025
Ranked by records at the address. A high count describes the record, not the conduct of any person or company. Property Outcome Reports for any address are available on request.
Open the timeline

How Seattle built the system, and what the record shows since.

Show or hide the timeline
2012

RRIO created

CB 117569 became Ordinance 124011, creating Seattle's rental registration and inspection program.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2016

Tenant protections and monitoring

CB 118678 became Ordinance 125054, which directs the SDCI Director to report annually to Council on rent increases at units with outstanding code violations. Committee discussion of recurring rental-market monitoring followed on Sept 21, 2016.

Ordinance text on file; committee record
2017

Renters' Commission created

CB 118921 became Ordinance 125280, creating an advisory Renters' Commission. The same year CB 118974 became Ordinance 125343, rewriting RRIO reporting metrics. The first annual report under Ordinance 125054 came due June 15, 2017.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2018

Studies and workplans

A University of Washington and City Auditor rental housing study (July 24, 2018); the Commission's 2018 work plan; the Renting in Seattle materials (Sept 11, 2018).

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2023

Enforcement concerns raised

Commission minutes record renters raising enforcement concerns. Nine 2023 SDCI findings documents for one apartment complex show six administrative closures.

Commission minutes; SDCI findings documents
Mar 2025

SDCI states the annual report was never prepared

In writing: "we've never prepared such a report."

SDCI email, Mar 7, 2025
Aug 2026

Council passes CB 121254

The rental junk-fee bill requires landlords to keep compliance records for three years and presumes a violation, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence, where records are missing. Effective July 1, 2027.

Bill text, SMC 7.24.045 (CB 121254, version 3)
Entries marked "working timeline" come from STLCA's historical source review and are cited in each investigation before publication.
Limitations and method

Counts come from the citywide landlord-tenant file of 56,258 records through Dec 31, 2025. Districts are assigned by STLCA from each record's address and coordinates; 668 records could not be assigned. "Complaint" and "notice of violation" follow the file's own record-type flags. "No inspection date" and "no inspection result" follow the file's own flags and are measurements of the public record. STLCA does not add, remove or estimate records.

This dossier states no finding about the intent of any person or company. Named addresses are those that appear in the public record.

← District 6 dossierBack to the District 7 dashboardDistrict 1 dossier →
Public record. Independent review. Traceable findings. Data today. Change tomorrow.