Home / Citywide / District 5 dashboard / Dossier
Accountability dossier · Council District 5

District 5: what the public record shows, and where it goes silent.

Open the dashboardRequest the full dossierPrint this page
Total records7,23212.9% of 56,258 citywide
Complaints5,14171% of records
Notices of violation1,34626.2 per 100 complaints
No inspection date63.2%4,568 of 7,232 records
Closed, no result60.8%3,986 of 6,560 closed cases
Executive summary

District 5 holds 7,232 of the 56,258 landlord-tenant records in the citywide file (12.9%), covering 2003 through 2025. 5,141 are complaints and 1,346 are notices of violation: 26.2 notices per 100 complaints, against 24.6 citywide. By that measure District 5 ranks 4 of 7, where 1 is the lowest notice rate.

63.2% of the district's records display no inspection date, against 64.2% citywide (rank 4 of 7, where 1 is the highest share). Of 6,560 closed or completed cases, 60.8% show no inspection result, against 61.6% citywide. 492 records still read "Under Investigation."

The share of records opened in a given year that display an inspection result was 93.8% for 2013 and 13.9% for 2025. The address with the most records is 12740 30th Ave Ne, with 76 records and 3 notices of violation.

These are measurements of what the public record contains. A missing inspection date does not prove that no inspection occurred, and a closed status is not proof that a condition was corrected.

Findings from the record

Every finding carries its label.

Analysis

Notice rate: 26.2 per 100 complaints against 24.6 citywide.

1,346 notices of violation on 5,141 complaints.Citywide landlord-tenant file, 56,258 records
Analysis

63.2% of records display no inspection date.

Citywide the share is 64.2%.4,568 of 7,232 District 5 records
Documented

Inspection results on file: 93.8% (opened 2013) to 13.9% (opened 2025).

Share of each year's records that display an inspection result.Field: last inspection result, by year opened
Documented

3,986 of 6,560 closed cases show no inspection result.

60.8% of closed or completed cases in District 5.Citywide: 61.6%
Open question

What was inspected before those cases closed?

The public export does not carry an inspection narrative for each case.Answerable only from the City's own case files
Limit of the record

A lower or higher rate does not say why.

It may reflect a different mix of complaints, faster resolution, or thinner documentation. The record alone cannot separate these.How STLCA reads every district figure
District 5 against the city

Side by side.

MeasureDistrict 5Citywide
Records7,23256,258
Complaints5,14140,540
Notices of violation1,3469,961
Notices per 100 complaints26.224.6
Records with no inspection date63.2%64.2%
Closed or completed, no inspection result60.8%61.6%
Records still "Under Investigation"4923,749
Records with a blank record type58.5%60.3%
The enforcement chain

What the record shows at each step.

1. Complaint
5,141complaints among 7,232 records
2. Inspection
63.2%of records display no inspection date (4,568)
3. Finding
Read per propertyCity findings documents are read address by address in case studies
4. Enforcement
1,346notices of violation, 26.2 per 100 complaints
5. Correction deadline
Not in this filecompliance-due dates are captured per notice in property runs
6. Follow-up
492records still read "Under Investigation"
7. Verified compliance
Not a public fieldthe public export has no verification field
8. Closure
60.8%of 6,560 closed or completed cases show no inspection result

Record volume, by year opened

02304616929222003: 1820032004: 1452005: 1212006: 1972007: 17120072008: 1242009: 1112010: 1082011: 11720112012: 1212013: 1782014: 1842015: 19120152016: 2152017: 2542018: 4092019: 49120192020: 4352021: 6612022: 8392023: 70820232024: 6882025: 7462025
Records per year opened. The last year (2025) is a full year of records through Dec 31, 2025.

Inspection result on file, by year opened

0%25%50%75%100%20032007201120152019202320252003: 61%2004: 59%2005: 65%2006: 74%2007: 71%2008: 79%2009: 87%2010: 90%2011: 89%2012: 87%2013: 94%2014: 83%2015: 85%2016: 88%2017: 70%2018: 24%2019: 15%2020: 15%2021: 20%2022: 19%2023: 14%2024: 20%2025: 14%
District 5Citywide
Share of that year's records that display an inspection result. Recent records may not yet have had an inspection.

Record status mix

COMPLETED: 5,225CLOSED: 1,335UNDER INVESTIGATION: 492NOV ISSUED: 67INITIATED: 36Other statuses: 777,232records
Completed5,225
Closed1,335
Under Investigation492
Nov Issued67
Initiated36
Other Statuses77
Properties

Addresses that appear most in District 5.

AddressRecordsComplaintsNoticesClosed, no resultYears
12740 30th Ave Ne7673382%2009–2025
14100 Linden Ave N71601166%2010–2025
13000 Linden Ave N6254747%2013–2025
14002 Linden Ave N5245662%2012–2025
747 N 135th St4643368%2006–2025
13280 Linden Ave N3732567%2018–2025
13751 32nd Ave Ne3731664%2010–2025
11038 Lake City Way Ne3631472%2007–2025
13030 Linden Ave N33231042%2008–2025
14200 Linden Ave N2827154%2010–2025
14337 32nd Ave Ne28141211%2004–2020
3300 Ne 125th St28280100%2022–2025
14027 Lake City Way Ne2626086%2014–2025
10306 Meridian Ave N2520538%2010–2025
12000 15th Ave Ne2523268%2017–2025
Ranked by records at the address. A high count describes the record, not the conduct of any person or company. Property Outcome Reports for any address are available on request.
Open the timeline

How Seattle built the system, and what the record shows since.

Show or hide the timeline
2012

RRIO created

CB 117569 became Ordinance 124011, creating Seattle's rental registration and inspection program.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2016

Tenant protections and monitoring

CB 118678 became Ordinance 125054, which directs the SDCI Director to report annually to Council on rent increases at units with outstanding code violations. Committee discussion of recurring rental-market monitoring followed on Sept 21, 2016.

Ordinance text on file; committee record
2017

Renters' Commission created

CB 118921 became Ordinance 125280, creating an advisory Renters' Commission. The same year CB 118974 became Ordinance 125343, rewriting RRIO reporting metrics. The first annual report under Ordinance 125054 came due June 15, 2017.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2018

Studies and workplans

A University of Washington and City Auditor rental housing study (July 24, 2018); the Commission's 2018 work plan; the Renting in Seattle materials (Sept 11, 2018).

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2023

Enforcement concerns raised

Commission minutes record renters raising enforcement concerns. Nine 2023 SDCI findings documents for one apartment complex show six administrative closures.

Commission minutes; SDCI findings documents
Mar 2025

SDCI states the annual report was never prepared

In writing: "we've never prepared such a report."

SDCI email, Mar 7, 2025
Aug 2026

Council passes CB 121254

The rental junk-fee bill requires landlords to keep compliance records for three years and presumes a violation, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence, where records are missing. Effective July 1, 2027.

Bill text, SMC 7.24.045 (CB 121254, version 3)
Entries marked "working timeline" come from STLCA's historical source review and are cited in each investigation before publication.
Limitations and method

Counts come from the citywide landlord-tenant file of 56,258 records through Dec 31, 2025. Districts are assigned by STLCA from each record's address and coordinates; 668 records could not be assigned. "Complaint" and "notice of violation" follow the file's own record-type flags. "No inspection date" and "no inspection result" follow the file's own flags and are measurements of the public record. STLCA does not add, remove or estimate records.

This dossier states no finding about the intent of any person or company. Named addresses are those that appear in the public record.

← District 4 dossierBack to the District 5 dashboardDistrict 6 dossier →
Public record. Independent review. Traceable findings. Data today. Change tomorrow.