Home / Citywide / District 4 dashboard / Dossier
Accountability dossier · Council District 4

District 4: what the public record shows, and where it goes silent.

Open the dashboardRequest the full dossierPrint this page
Total records6,67611.9% of 56,258 citywide
Complaints4,65970% of records
Notices of violation1,23226.4 per 100 complaints
No inspection date62.1%4,147 of 6,676 records
Closed, no result59.0%3,561 of 6,037 closed cases
Executive summary

District 4 holds 6,676 of the 56,258 landlord-tenant records in the citywide file (11.9%), covering 2003 through 2025. 4,659 are complaints and 1,232 are notices of violation: 26.4 notices per 100 complaints, against 24.6 citywide. By that measure District 4 ranks 5 of 7, where 1 is the lowest notice rate.

62.1% of the district's records display no inspection date, against 64.2% citywide (rank 5 of 7, where 1 is the highest share). Of 6,037 closed or completed cases, 59.0% show no inspection result, against 61.6% citywide. 478 records still read "Under Investigation."

The share of records opened in a given year that display an inspection result was 87.3% for 2013 and 8.7% for 2025. The address with the most records is 4547 19th Ave Ne, with 37 records and 12 notices of violation.

These are measurements of what the public record contains. A missing inspection date does not prove that no inspection occurred, and a closed status is not proof that a condition was corrected.

Findings from the record

Every finding carries its label.

Analysis

Notice rate: 26.4 per 100 complaints against 24.6 citywide.

1,232 notices of violation on 4,659 complaints.Citywide landlord-tenant file, 56,258 records
Analysis

62.1% of records display no inspection date.

Citywide the share is 64.2%.4,147 of 6,676 District 4 records
Documented

Inspection results on file: 87.3% (opened 2013) to 8.7% (opened 2025).

Share of each year's records that display an inspection result.Field: last inspection result, by year opened
Documented

3,561 of 6,037 closed cases show no inspection result.

59.0% of closed or completed cases in District 4.Citywide: 61.6%
Open question

What was inspected before those cases closed?

The public export does not carry an inspection narrative for each case.Answerable only from the City's own case files
Limit of the record

A lower or higher rate does not say why.

It may reflect a different mix of complaints, faster resolution, or thinner documentation. The record alone cannot separate these.How STLCA reads every district figure
District 4 against the city

Side by side.

MeasureDistrict 4Citywide
Records6,67656,258
Complaints4,65940,540
Notices of violation1,2329,961
Notices per 100 complaints26.424.6
Records with no inspection date62.1%64.2%
Closed or completed, no inspection result59.0%61.6%
Records still "Under Investigation"4783,749
Records with a blank record type61.7%60.3%
The enforcement chain

What the record shows at each step.

1. Complaint
4,659complaints among 6,676 records
2. Inspection
62.1%of records display no inspection date (4,147)
3. Finding
Read per propertyCity findings documents are read address by address in case studies
4. Enforcement
1,232notices of violation, 26.4 per 100 complaints
5. Correction deadline
Not in this filecompliance-due dates are captured per notice in property runs
6. Follow-up
478records still read "Under Investigation"
7. Verified compliance
Not a public fieldthe public export has no verification field
8. Closure
59.0%of 6,037 closed or completed cases show no inspection result

Record volume, by year opened

02004006008002003: 1820032004: 1402005: 1492006: 1422007: 17920072008: 1112009: 982010: 1332011: 10120112012: 1452013: 1572014: 1852015: 15220152016: 1462017: 2302018: 4162019: 44820192020: 4862021: 6212022: 6512023: 65720232024: 5832025: 7282025
Records per year opened. The last year (2025) is a full year of records through Dec 31, 2025.

Inspection result on file, by year opened

0%25%50%75%100%20032007201120152019202320252003: 72%2004: 63%2005: 68%2006: 75%2007: 84%2008: 87%2009: 80%2010: 87%2011: 83%2012: 86%2013: 87%2014: 79%2015: 72%2016: 86%2017: 69%2018: 26%2019: 26%2020: 29%2021: 29%2022: 17%2023: 14%2024: 13%2025: 9%
District 4Citywide
Share of that year's records that display an inspection result. Recent records may not yet have had an inspection.

Record status mix

COMPLETED: 4,857CLOSED: 1,180UNDER INVESTIGATION: 478NOV ISSUED: 45INITIATED: 38Other statuses: 786,676records
Completed4,857
Closed1,180
Under Investigation478
Nov Issued45
Initiated38
Other Statuses78
Properties

Addresses that appear most in District 4.

AddressRecordsComplaintsNoticesClosed, no resultYears
4547 19th Ave Ne37231230%2004–2025
6620 Roosevelt Way Ne3636090%2022–2025
7101 62nd Ave Ne3431378%2018–2025
4126 12th Ave Ne3127343%2013–2025
1305 Ne 43rd St2725271%2006–2025
4238 12th Ave Ne27151111%2009–2019
4504 Bagley Ave N27270100%2022–2024
4750 15th Ave Ne2727092%2018–2025
4730 University Way Ne2624191%2021–2025
5033 Brooklyn Ave Ne26151129%2017–2025
5112 Ravenna Ave Ne2520577%2018–2025
5034 9th Ave Ne2319371%2007–2025
4134 11th Ave Ne2216675%2019–2025
6940 62nd Ave Ne2119271%2013–2025
8500 20th Ave Ne2121094%2019–2025
Ranked by records at the address. A high count describes the record, not the conduct of any person or company. Property Outcome Reports for any address are available on request.
Open the timeline

How Seattle built the system, and what the record shows since.

Show or hide the timeline
2012

RRIO created

CB 117569 became Ordinance 124011, creating Seattle's rental registration and inspection program.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2016

Tenant protections and monitoring

CB 118678 became Ordinance 125054, which directs the SDCI Director to report annually to Council on rent increases at units with outstanding code violations. Committee discussion of recurring rental-market monitoring followed on Sept 21, 2016.

Ordinance text on file; committee record
2017

Renters' Commission created

CB 118921 became Ordinance 125280, creating an advisory Renters' Commission. The same year CB 118974 became Ordinance 125343, rewriting RRIO reporting metrics. The first annual report under Ordinance 125054 came due June 15, 2017.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2018

Studies and workplans

A University of Washington and City Auditor rental housing study (July 24, 2018); the Commission's 2018 work plan; the Renting in Seattle materials (Sept 11, 2018).

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2023

Enforcement concerns raised

Commission minutes record renters raising enforcement concerns. Nine 2023 SDCI findings documents for one apartment complex show six administrative closures.

Commission minutes; SDCI findings documents
Mar 2025

SDCI states the annual report was never prepared

In writing: "we've never prepared such a report."

SDCI email, Mar 7, 2025
Aug 2026

Council passes CB 121254

The rental junk-fee bill requires landlords to keep compliance records for three years and presumes a violation, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence, where records are missing. Effective July 1, 2027.

Bill text, SMC 7.24.045 (CB 121254, version 3)
Entries marked "working timeline" come from STLCA's historical source review and are cited in each investigation before publication.
Limitations and method

Counts come from the citywide landlord-tenant file of 56,258 records through Dec 31, 2025. Districts are assigned by STLCA from each record's address and coordinates; 668 records could not be assigned. "Complaint" and "notice of violation" follow the file's own record-type flags. "No inspection date" and "no inspection result" follow the file's own flags and are measurements of the public record. STLCA does not add, remove or estimate records.

This dossier states no finding about the intent of any person or company. Named addresses are those that appear in the public record.

← District 3 dossierBack to the District 4 dashboardDistrict 5 dossier →
Public record. Independent review. Traceable findings. Data today. Change tomorrow.