Home / Citywide / District 3 dashboard / Dossier
Accountability dossier · Council District 3

District 3: what the public record shows, and where it goes silent.

Open the dashboardRequest the full dossierPrint this page
Total records11,09219.7% of 56,258 citywide
Complaints8,30975% of records
Notices of violation1,70720.5 per 100 complaints
No inspection date66.4%7,364 of 11,092 records
Closed, no result64.1%6,431 of 10,036 closed cases
Executive summary

District 3 holds 11,092 of the 56,258 landlord-tenant records in the citywide file (19.7%), covering 2003 through 2025. 8,309 are complaints and 1,707 are notices of violation: 20.5 notices per 100 complaints, against 24.6 citywide. By that measure District 3 ranks 2 of 7, where 1 is the lowest notice rate.

66.4% of the district's records display no inspection date, against 64.2% citywide (rank 3 of 7, where 1 is the highest share). Of 10,036 closed or completed cases, 64.1% show no inspection result, against 61.6% citywide. 765 records still read "Under Investigation."

The share of records opened in a given year that display an inspection result was 87.2% for 2013 and 10.2% for 2025. The address with the most records is 1727 Summit Ave, with 82 records and 21 notices of violation.

These are measurements of what the public record contains. A missing inspection date does not prove that no inspection occurred, and a closed status is not proof that a condition was corrected.

Findings from the record

Every finding carries its label.

Analysis

Notice rate: 20.5 per 100 complaints against 24.6 citywide.

1,707 notices of violation on 8,309 complaints.Citywide landlord-tenant file, 56,258 records
Analysis

66.4% of records display no inspection date.

Citywide the share is 64.2%.7,364 of 11,092 District 3 records
Documented

Inspection results on file: 87.2% (opened 2013) to 10.2% (opened 2025).

Share of each year's records that display an inspection result.Field: last inspection result, by year opened
Documented

6,431 of 10,036 closed cases show no inspection result.

64.1% of closed or completed cases in District 3.Citywide: 61.6%
Open question

What was inspected before those cases closed?

The public export does not carry an inspection narrative for each case.Answerable only from the City's own case files
Limit of the record

A lower or higher rate does not say why.

It may reflect a different mix of complaints, faster resolution, or thinner documentation. The record alone cannot separate these.How STLCA reads every district figure
District 3 against the city

Side by side.

MeasureDistrict 3Citywide
Records11,09256,258
Complaints8,30940,540
Notices of violation1,7079,961
Notices per 100 complaints20.524.6
Records with no inspection date66.4%64.2%
Closed or completed, no inspection result64.1%61.6%
Records still "Under Investigation"7653,749
Records with a blank record type60.8%60.3%
The enforcement chain

What the record shows at each step.

1. Complaint
8,309complaints among 11,092 records
2. Inspection
66.4%of records display no inspection date (7,364)
3. Finding
Read per propertyCity findings documents are read address by address in case studies
4. Enforcement
1,707notices of violation, 20.5 per 100 complaints
5. Correction deadline
Not in this filecompliance-due dates are captured per notice in property runs
6. Follow-up
765records still read "Under Investigation"
7. Verified compliance
Not a public fieldthe public export has no verification field
8. Closure
64.1%of 10,036 closed or completed cases show no inspection result

Record volume, by year opened

03697391,1081,4782003: 3420032004: 2452005: 2342006: 2982007: 25620072008: 1812009: 1912010: 1802011: 16620112012: 1852013: 1952014: 2562015: 25820152016: 2552017: 3242018: 6552019: 69220192020: 6872021: 7762022: 1,1032023: 1,25320232024: 1,3442025: 1,3242025
Records per year opened. The last year (2025) is a full year of records through Dec 31, 2025.

Inspection result on file, by year opened

0%25%50%75%100%20032007201120152019202320252003: 56%2004: 68%2005: 69%2006: 78%2007: 72%2008: 75%2009: 84%2010: 76%2011: 90%2012: 83%2013: 87%2014: 81%2015: 74%2016: 70%2017: 67%2018: 22%2019: 27%2020: 22%2021: 24%2022: 11%2023: 10%2024: 15%2025: 10%
District 3Citywide
Share of that year's records that display an inspection result. Recent records may not yet have had an inspection.

Record status mix

COMPLETED: 7,686CLOSED: 2,350UNDER INVESTIGATION: 765INITIATED: 74OPEN DUPLICATE: 67Other statuses: 15011,092records
Completed7,686
Closed2,350
Under Investigation765
Initiated74
Open Duplicate67
Other Statuses150
Properties

Addresses that appear most in District 3.

AddressRecordsComplaintsNoticesClosed, no resultYears
1727 Summit Ave82612141%2007–2025
1621 17th Ave72720100%2022–2025
430 12th Ave E72442834%2004–2024
903 Union St5849759%2004–2025
915 E Harrison St48331430%2006–2024
1317 Boren Ave4740661%2009–2025
1400 Madison St4641566%2018–2025
155 21st Ave4439563%2018–2025
418 E Loretta Pl4439534%2010–2025
1100 University St4340374%2012–2025
1020 University St4233938%2005–2025
1515 Belmont Ave4136594%2004–2025
843 Hiawatha Pl S41410100%2022–2025
504 E Denny Way3930866%2006–2025
1412 Summit Ave3831649%2013–2025
Ranked by records at the address. A high count describes the record, not the conduct of any person or company. Property Outcome Reports for any address are available on request.
Open the timeline

How Seattle built the system, and what the record shows since.

Show or hide the timeline
2012

RRIO created

CB 117569 became Ordinance 124011, creating Seattle's rental registration and inspection program.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2016

Tenant protections and monitoring

CB 118678 became Ordinance 125054, which directs the SDCI Director to report annually to Council on rent increases at units with outstanding code violations. Committee discussion of recurring rental-market monitoring followed on Sept 21, 2016.

Ordinance text on file; committee record
2017

Renters' Commission created

CB 118921 became Ordinance 125280, creating an advisory Renters' Commission. The same year CB 118974 became Ordinance 125343, rewriting RRIO reporting metrics. The first annual report under Ordinance 125054 came due June 15, 2017.

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2018

Studies and workplans

A University of Washington and City Auditor rental housing study (July 24, 2018); the Commission's 2018 work plan; the Renting in Seattle materials (Sept 11, 2018).

Working timeline from STLCA's source review
2023

Enforcement concerns raised

Commission minutes record renters raising enforcement concerns. Nine 2023 SDCI findings documents for one apartment complex show six administrative closures.

Commission minutes; SDCI findings documents
Mar 2025

SDCI states the annual report was never prepared

In writing: "we've never prepared such a report."

SDCI email, Mar 7, 2025
Aug 2026

Council passes CB 121254

The rental junk-fee bill requires landlords to keep compliance records for three years and presumes a violation, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence, where records are missing. Effective July 1, 2027.

Bill text, SMC 7.24.045 (CB 121254, version 3)
Entries marked "working timeline" come from STLCA's historical source review and are cited in each investigation before publication.
Limitations and method

Counts come from the citywide landlord-tenant file of 56,258 records through Dec 31, 2025. Districts are assigned by STLCA from each record's address and coordinates; 668 records could not be assigned. "Complaint" and "notice of violation" follow the file's own record-type flags. "No inspection date" and "no inspection result" follow the file's own flags and are measurements of the public record. STLCA does not add, remove or estimate records.

This dossier states no finding about the intent of any person or company. Named addresses are those that appear in the public record.

← District 2 dossierBack to the District 3 dashboardDistrict 4 dossier →
Public record. Independent review. Traceable findings. Data today. Change tomorrow.